A universe tilted toward technology
As of 6 October 2026, the platform tracks 2,331 companies spread across eight sectors. Technology is the clear heavyweight by headcount — 632 names, roughly 27% of the universe — anchored by familiar megacaps like Apple, Microsoft and NVIDIA, with AMD, Salesforce and Intel filling out the sample. Industrials (446) and Healthcare (383) come next, and Basic Materials (332) rounds out the top four. Together those four sectors hold about 1,793 companies — more than three-quarters of everything tracked.
Where the long tail lives
The composition makes clear this is a global universe, not a US-only one. Industrials ranges from Honeywell down to Xiamen Solex (Shanghai), ARCH Meter (Taiwan) and Archer Aviation. Healthcare spans Johnson & Johnson and UnitedHealth to GoodRx and Korea-listed PenetriumBio. Basic Materials, fourth-largest by count, leans heavily on small miners and fertiliser names — China XLX Fert, Galantas Gold, Argentina Lithium — rather than household blue chips.
By contrast, Consumer Cyclical (168) and Communication Services (90) are comparatively thin on names, even though they hold Amazon, Tesla, Alphabet, Meta and Netflix. In this universe, economic weight and raw company count plainly do not line up.
A caution on the cap totals
The reported sector market-cap totals should not be read at face value. Financials shows roughly $159.5T, Energy $106.6T and Basic Materials $47.2T — each larger than Technology's $22.7T — while Consumer Cyclical registers just $0.58T despite containing both Amazon and Tesla. Those figures are internally inconsistent.
Part of the explanation sits right in the sample names: the same company appears under several listings. Novo Resources shows up as both NVO.TO and NVO.AX; Galantas Gold as GAL.V and GAL.L; Obsidian Energy as OBE and OBE.TO; Tesla as TL0.F and TL0.DE; Alphabet as GOOGL and GOOG. Duplicate cross-listings inflate both the company counts and any naive cap aggregation, which likely explains why the totals skew toward the resource-heavy sectors.
What an investor might watch
- Concentration risk. With a quarter of the universe in Technology and the same megacaps recurring, moves in Apple, Microsoft or NVIDIA ripple disproportionately across the tracked set.
- The materials and energy tail. Hundreds of small miners and explorers add genuine breadth, but also noise and illiquidity that the top-line names mask.
- Data hygiene. Treat sector cap totals as directional at best until duplicate listings are de-duplicated; the company counts are the more trustworthy signal here.
The headline, then, is breadth: a wide, globally diversified universe with a strong technology core and a deep resource-sector tail — paired with a clear reminder that aggregate figures deserve scrutiny before they drive any decision.