As of 4 October 2026, the Headmars platform tracks 2,329 companies across eight sectors. How that universe is distributed tells you something about where investor attention concentrates — and where the data itself needs a careful eye.
Technology leads on breadth
Technology is the clear heavyweight by company count, with 631 names — more than a quarter of the entire universe. The sample reads like the usual roll call: Apple (AAPL), Microsoft (MSFT), NVIDIA (NVDA), AMD, Salesforce (CRM), and Intel (INTC). Industrials follow with 446 companies and Healthcare with 383, giving the top three sectors 1,460 names between them, roughly 63% of coverage.
Industrials is the most geographically varied of the leaders: alongside Honeywell (HON) and nVent (NVT) sit Shanghai-listed Xiamen Solex, Taiwan's Arch Meter, shipping play ZIM, and eVTOL hopeful Archer Aviation (ACHR). It is less a theme than a catch-all.
The long tail
Basic Materials (332) and the smaller sectors — Consumer Cyclical (167), Energy (141), Financials (139), and Communication Services (90) — round out the universe. The marquee names are concentrated here: Amazon (AMZN), Tesla (TSLA) and Alibaba in Consumer Cyclical; Exxon (XOM), Shell and Reliance in Energy; Berkshire (BRK.B), JPMorgan (JPM), Visa (V) and Mastercard (MA) in Financials; Alphabet (GOOGL), Meta (META), Netflix (NFLX) and Tencent in Communication Services.
A recurring feature across sectors is cross-listing duplication: Tesla appears as both TL0.F and TL0.DE, Alphabet as GOOGL and GOOG, Novo Resources as NVO.TO and NVO.AX, Galantas Gold as GAL.V and GAL.L. These inflate raw counts and almost certainly distort any naive market-cap roll-up.
A market-cap puzzle
Which brings us to the figures that don't add up. If you rank sectors by reported total market cap, the order flips entirely: Financials tops the table at ~$159T, Energy at ~$107T, and Basic Materials at ~$47T — all ahead of Technology's ~$22.7T. Meanwhile Consumer Cyclical, home to Amazon and Tesla, reports a total of just ~$577B.
That is not a credible picture of global equity markets, and I'd caution against reading it as one. The most likely culprits are double-counted cross-listings, mixed reporting currencies, and unit inconsistencies rather than any real economic shift. The honest takeaway: company counts are the trustworthy axis today; the aggregate caps are not.
What to watch
For an investor using this universe, two things matter. First, concentration — Technology's breadth means index-like exposure here leans heavily tech, regardless of intent. Second, data hygiene: before the market-cap column drives any screen or allocation, the cross-listing and currency issues need resolving. Fix the plumbing first; trust the numbers second.