The Headmars universe currently spans 2,284 tracked companies across eight sectors. Before drawing conclusions about any single holding, it is worth stepping back to see the shape of the whole board — where the names cluster, which industries carry weight, and where the underlying data invites a second look.
Technology sets the pace by headcount
Measured by number of companies, Technology is the clear leader with 618 names — roughly 27% of the entire universe. The sample reads like the sector's marquee list: Apple (AAPL), Microsoft (MSFT), NVIDIA (NVDA), AMD, Salesforce (CRM) and Intel (INTC). Industrials follows at 439 companies and Healthcare at 377, with anchors like Honeywell (HON), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) and UnitedHealth (UNH). Together, the top four sectors by count — adding Basic Materials at 321 — account for about 77% of tracked names.
The long tail is more concentrated. Financials (137) and Energy (138) are represented by fewer, larger franchises: Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.B), JPMorgan (JPM), Visa (V) and Mastercard (MA) on one side; Exxon Mobil (XOM), Shell (SHEL.L) and Reliance (RELIANCE.NS) on the other. Communication Services is the smallest at 89 names, but a potent 89 — Alphabet, Meta, Netflix, Disney and Tencent all sit here.
A global, multi-listing universe
The sample names underline how international the coverage is. Alongside US tickers you find Shanghai (603992.SS, 603207.SS), Hong Kong (1866.HK, 9988.HK, 0700.HK), Taiwan (4588.TW), Korea (187660.KQ) and Frankfurt (TL0.F, TL0.DE) listings. Several companies appear more than once across venues — Tesla via TL0.F and TL0.DE, Novo Resources via NVO.TO and NVO.AX, Galantas Gold via GAL.V and GAL.L. Investors screening this universe should expect duplicate exposures under different tickers.
Read the market-cap column with caution
Here the data gets interesting — and, frankly, suspect. Ranked by reported total market cap, the order flips entirely: Financials tops the list at about $159.5T, Energy at $106.5T and Basic Materials at $47.2T all sit above Technology's $22.7T, while Consumer Cyclical — home to Amazon, Tesla and Alibaba — shows just $576B across 165 companies.
Those figures do not square with the company counts or with what these names are worth in reality. Energy and Financials carrying multiples of Technology's aggregate cap, and Consumer Cyclical registering less than a trillion, points to noise in the totals — likely currency mixing across the many non-US listings, or stale and mis-scaled values rather than a genuine signal. I would treat company count as the trustworthy axis here and the cap column as a data-quality flag to chase down.
What to watch
Two things. First, the concentration of Technology and Communication Services means the universe's behaviour will lean heavily on a familiar set of megacaps. Second, the market-cap inconsistencies are a reminder that clean aggregate metrics start with clean, currency-normalised inputs — worth fixing before any weighting or ranking leans on them.