As of 2 September 2026, the tracked universe spans eight sectors and 2,190 companies. Counting names is a crude proxy for coverage, but it reveals where breadth lives — and where an investor's attention gets pulled versus where the platform actually casts its net.
Technology leads by headcount
Technology is the widest sector by a clear margin, with 595 companies — more than a quarter of the entire universe. The sample reads like the sector's spine: Apple, Microsoft, NVIDIA, AMD, Salesforce and Intel. Industrials follows at 421 and Healthcare at 366, giving the top three sectors 1,382 names between them, roughly 63% of all coverage.
The long tail is instructive too. Industrials mixes megacaps like Honeywell with speculative aviation (Archer Aviation) and Chinese and Taiwanese listings (Xiamen Solex, Arch Meter). Basic Materials, at 303 companies, skews toward miners and fertiliser producers — China XLX Fert, Galantas Gold, Argentina Lithium. This is a universe that reaches well beyond US large caps.
Where headcount and reported cap diverge
Here the data gets interesting — and demands scepticism. Ranked by the reported aggregate market cap, the ordering scrambles entirely. Financials tops the list, followed by Energy and Basic Materials, with Technology only fourth. Consumer Cyclical shows the smallest aggregate cap of any sector despite holding Amazon and Tesla.
That is a red flag, not an insight. A sector containing Amazon, Tesla, Home Depot and Alibaba cannot plausibly be the lightest by capitalisation. The reported aggregates almost certainly suffer from currency mismatches, stale figures, or double-counting — and the sample names hint at why.
Cross-listings inflate the count
Several sectors carry the same underlying company more than once. Novo Resources appears as NVO.TO and NVO.AX; Galantas Gold as GAL.V and GAL.L; Tesla as TL0.F and TL0.DE; Alphabet as both GOOGL and GOOG. These cross-listings pad the company counts and, if their caps are summed rather than deduplicated, distort any sector total. Treat both the headcounts and the cap aggregates as upper bounds, not precise measures.
What an investor might watch
Three things stand out. First, concentration of breadth in Technology means sector-level moves in semiconductors and software will ripple through a large share of tracked names — AAPL, MSFT and NVDA anchor sentiment well beyond their own sector. Second, the materials and energy tail — miners, lithium plays, oil and gas — offers cyclical exposure that the tech-heavy count understates. Third, and most practically, the market-cap figures need cleaning before they drive any allocation logic; the ordering they produce contradicts what the constituent names imply.
Breadth is a strength: this universe is genuinely global and multi-sector. But the divergence between where companies cluster and where the reported capital sits is the real signal here — and for now it points at the data pipeline, not the market.