The universe at a glance
As of 2026-08-14 the platform tracks 1,975 companies across eight sectors. Breadth — how many distinct names populate a sector — is the cleanest signal we have, and by that measure the ranking is unambiguous:
| Sector | Companies |
|---|---|
| Technology | 565 |
| Industrials | 383 |
| Healthcare | 329 |
| Basic Materials | 248 |
| Consumer Cyclical | 141 |
| Financials | 116 |
| Energy | 115 |
| Communication Services | 78 |
Technology alone accounts for more than one in four tracked names. Add Industrials and Healthcare and you have 65% of the universe in three sectors.
Technology leads on breadth
The Technology roster reads like the market's center of gravity: AAPL, MSFT, and NVDA anchor the megacaps, with AMD, CRM, and INTC filling out the semiconductor and software middle. This is the deepest bench we cover, and it is where an index-aware investor should expect the most correlation risk — a lot of these names move together on the same rate and AI-spend narratives.
The industrial and materials middle
Industrials (383) is strikingly international, spanning Honeywell (HON) and nVent (NVT) alongside listings like Xiamen Solex (603992.SS) and Taiwan's Arch Meter (4588.TW), plus speculative aviation via Archer (ACHR). Basic Materials (248) leans heavily toward miners and fertilizer producers — China XLX (1866.HK), Galantas Gold, and several lithium and gold explorers. These two sectors give the universe genuine cyclical and commodity exposure that the megacap tech names don't.
Where the market-cap totals get strange
Here the data demands skepticism. Ranked by reported total market cap, the order inverts the company counts: Financials tops the list at ~$159T, Energy at ~$107T, and Basic Materials at ~$46T — while Technology, our largest sector by names, reports only ~$22T and Consumer Cyclical a mere ~$0.56T. That is not plausible for a real market. The likely culprits are visible right in the sample data: duplicate cross-listings (GOOGL/GOOG, NVO.TO/NVO.AX, OBE/OBE.TO, TL0.F/TL0.DE) and probable currency-conversion artifacts inflating certain non-US tickers. Treat the cap totals as a data-quality flag, not a valuation.
What to watch
- Concentration: With Tech, Industrials, and Healthcare holding two-thirds of the names, breadth-based screens will over-sample those themes. Weight accordingly.
- Data hygiene: The cap discrepancies suggest cross-listing de-duplication and FX normalization should sit high on the roadmap before any cap-weighted analytics ship.
- Underweighted corners: Communication Services (78) is thin but carries outsized names — GOOGL, META, NFLX, Tencent — a reminder that fewer tickers doesn't mean less importance.