The shape of the universe
As of 2026-08-09, the platform tracks 1,909 securities across eight GICS-style sectors. The distribution is top-heavy, and by company count the leaderboard is unambiguous:
- Technology — 552 names (~29%)
- Industrials — 370 (~19%)
- Healthcare — 317 (~17%)
- Basic Materials — 232 (~12%)
- Consumer Cyclical — 138 (~7%)
- Financials — 115 (~6%)
- Energy — 110 (~6%)
- Communication Services — 75 (~4%)
The top three sectors alone hold about 65% of the roster. That concentration mirrors where public listings — and investor attention — have piled up this cycle.
Technology sits at the center
No surprise which names anchor the largest bucket: AAPL, MSFT, and NVDA headline Technology, with AMD, CRM, and INTC rounding out the sample. Communication Services is small by count (75) but heavyweight by influence, carrying GOOGL/GOOG, META, NFLX, and Tencent (0700.HK). Read together, the two sectors form the familiar mega-cap growth core that tends to set the tone for broad indices.
The breadth story — and its footnotes
What stands out is how global the coverage runs. Industrials pairs Honeywell (HON) with Xiamen Solex (603992.SS) and Archer Aviation (ACHR); Energy spans XOM, Shell (SHEL.L), and Reliance (RELIANCE.NS). That reach is a genuine strength for anyone screening beyond US large caps.
It comes with a caveat, though. The sample names are riddled with cross-listings — Tesla as TSLA, TL0.F, and TL0.DE; Alphabet as GOOGL and GOOG; Galantas Gold as GAL.V and GAL.L; Novo and Obsidian each appearing under two tickers. Duplicate listings inflate raw counts, so the sector percentages should be read as approximate rather than a clean count of distinct businesses.
A word on the market-cap column
Here I'll be opinionated: the aggregate totalMarketCapM figures do not hang together. Financials is credited with roughly $159 trillion and Basic Materials $46 trillion, dwarfing Technology's $22 trillion — an ordering that inverts every real-world benchmark. Those totals are almost certainly corrupted by currency mismatches, unit errors, or double-counted cross-listings. Until the pipeline reconciles them, company count is the more trustworthy lens for describing this universe.
What an investor might watch
- Concentration risk. With ~65% of names in three sectors, a portfolio screened naively from this universe will lean tech-and-industrials by construction. Deliberate weighting toward the thinner buckets — Financials, Energy, Communication Services — restores balance.
- De-duplication. Before treating counts as fundamentals, collapse cross-listings to primary tickers.
- The mega-cap gravity well. A handful of names in Technology and Communication Services carry outsized weight; their earnings cadence will move far more than their headcount suggests.
The universe is broad, global, and tech-tilted. Just mind the plumbing before you trust the dollar totals.