The shape of the universe
As of 2026-08-07, the platform tracks roughly 1,893 companies spread across eight GICS-style sectors. By count, the distribution is unmistakably top-heavy toward Technology, which alone accounts for 545 names — nearly 29% of the entire universe. Its sample roster reads like the sector's spine: Apple, Microsoft, NVIDIA, AMD, Salesforce, and Intel.
Behind Technology, the middle of the pack is thick. Industrials (367) and Healthcare (316) form a substantial second tier, followed by Basic Materials (228). The tail — Consumer Cyclical (138), Financials (115), Energy (109), and Communication Services (75) — is leaner but concentrated, holding some of the largest single names on the platform.
Notable names by sector
Each sector carries recognizable anchors. Consumer Cyclical is headlined by Amazon, Tesla, and Home Depot, alongside Alibaba. Financials leans on Berkshire Hathaway, JPMorgan, Visa, and Mastercard. Communication Services is compact but heavyweight: Alphabet, Meta, Netflix, Disney, and Tencent. Energy spans Exxon Mobil, Shell, and Reliance Industries. The presence of tickers like Archer Aviation in Industrials and Argentina Lithium in Basic Materials shows the universe reaches well past mega-cap incumbents into smaller, thematic bets.
A caution on the market-cap figures
The aggregate market-cap totals deserve a skeptical eye. Taken at face value, Financials reports the largest sector total ($159T), ahead of Energy ($107T) and Basic Materials ($46T), while Technology sits far lower ($22T). That ordering contradicts the sector composition and real-world weightings — a strong signal that the totals are distorted rather than clean.
The likely culprit is visible right in the sample data: cross-listed duplicates. Tesla appears as both TL0.F and TL0.DE; Alphabet as GOOG and GOOGL; Obsidian Energy as OBE and OBE.TO; Novo Resources as NVO.TO and NVO.AX; Galantas Gold as GAL.V and GAL.L. When the same company is counted through multiple venues — and possibly in mixed currencies — sector totals inflate unevenly. Treat the company counts as the more reliable structural signal and the cap totals as directional at best.
What an investor might watch
- Concentration risk in Technology. With nearly a third of tracked names in one sector, any broad screen or equal-weight strategy over this universe carries a heavy tech tilt by construction.
- The Industrials + Healthcare core. Together these two hold 683 names — more than Technology alone. They offer the deepest breadth for diversification away from the tech cluster.
- Data hygiene before conviction. The cross-listing artifacts are a reminder to de-duplicate by underlying entity before drawing cap-weighted conclusions. A name that shows up on three exchanges is still one company.
The tracked universe is genuinely global and broad, but breadth cuts both ways: it captures thematic frontier names and blue-chip anchors alike, while inviting double-counting that can quietly skew any sector-level aggregate. Count the companies first; trust the dollar figures second.