The shape of the universe
As of 2026-07-29, Headmars tracks 1,780 companies across eight GICS-style sectors. The distribution by company count is lopsided toward the familiar: Technology leads with 515 names, followed by Industrials (355) and Healthcare (302). Together those three account for roughly two-thirds of every ticker we follow. At the thin end sit Communication Services (73), Energy (100), and Financials (102) — small in headcount but heavy with household names.
Who's actually in there
The marquee tickers are concentrated where you'd expect. Technology anchors on Apple, Microsoft, and NVIDIA, with AMD, Salesforce, and Intel rounding out the sample. Communication Services is tiny by count but carries Alphabet (listed twice, as GOOGL and GOOG), Meta, Netflix, Disney, and Tencent. Financials leans on Berkshire Hathaway, JPMorgan, Visa, and Mastercard; Consumer Cyclical on Amazon, Tesla, and Home Depot.
What's striking is the long tail. Industrials mixes Honeywell and nVent with Xiamen Solex, Archer Aviation, and a Taiwanese meter maker. Basic Materials is almost entirely small-cap miners and fertilizer names — China XLX, Galantas Gold, Argentina Lithium. This is a genuinely global, multi-exchange set, not an S&P mirror.
A word on the market-cap column
Here's where an investor should be skeptical. The reported totalMarketCapM figures do not line up with the names or the counts. Financials shows $159T, Energy $106T, and Basic Materials $44T — each larger than Technology's $22T — while Consumer Cyclical, home to Amazon and Tesla, reports just $547B. That ordering is not credible.
The likely culprits are baked into the sample itself: cross-listed duplicates (Tesla appears as TSLA, TL0.F, and TL0.DE; Alphabet as GOOGL and GOOG; Novo Resources across three exchanges) and un-normalized foreign currencies inflating some sectors while local-listing quirks deflate others. Treat these totals as a data-hygiene flag, not a market signal.
What to watch
Two things follow from this snapshot.
First, breadth over concentration. If you're screening within Headmars, the tracked-count distribution tells you where discovery is richest — Technology, Industrials, and Healthcare give the widest field to hunt in, while Communication Services offers a short, high-conviction list.
Second, cap figures need cleaning before they mean anything. Cross-listing deduplication and FX normalization are the obvious next steps; until then, ranking sectors by size using this column will mislead. The company-count view is the trustworthy one today.
The headline, then, is unglamorous but useful: the universe is broad, global, and tech-heavy by name — and its size metrics still need a scrub before they earn a place in any allocation decision.